tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post3052956348734938530..comments2024-03-05T06:00:22.338-05:00Comments on All Things Pros: Selecting means more than one choice (Ex parte Hemmat)Karen G. Hazzahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14864564225463528630noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post-46041311172278780452009-11-03T19:02:46.228-05:002009-11-03T19:02:46.228-05:00It looks like you avoid the at-least-one problem. ...It looks like you avoid the at-least-one problem. That's good. But it seems you accomplish this by being vague about the quantity of "search result". I don't like vague, although some practitioners think vagueness is a good thing. [Or even a great thing.] <br /><br />Is "result" is meant to be singular or plural? <br />Also, how does "result" tie to the list and the candidates?Karen G. Hazzahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14864564225463528630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post-23171596379419235042009-11-03T14:07:50.429-05:002009-11-03T14:07:50.429-05:00How about:
A method for identifying a best match c...How about:<br />A method for identifying a best match candidate, the method comprising: <br /> initiating a search to obtain a list of one or more (potential)candidates;<br /> obtaining a search result; and<br /> using the search result to identify the best match candidate.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com