tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post4526192740970740300..comments2024-03-05T06:00:22.338-05:00Comments on All Things Pros: Federal Circuit says obviousness relying on "predictable use" requires some explanationKaren G. Hazzahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14864564225463528630noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post-90799584877918001222010-06-01T14:21:02.748-04:002010-06-01T14:21:02.748-04:00"the next time I get a conclusory statement o..."the next time I get a conclusory statement of obviousness which doesn't explain why or how. "<br /><br />You and I both know that never happens.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post-25139334527037685112010-06-01T09:31:04.721-04:002010-06-01T09:31:04.721-04:00>emphasized that this case is nonprecedential. ...>emphasized that this case is nonprecedential. <br /><br />Good point. I'll revise my post.Karen G. Hazzahhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14864564225463528630noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post-8644743860313516042010-06-01T09:29:07.417-04:002010-06-01T09:29:07.417-04:00Although you already mentioned that this case is n...Although you already mentioned that this case is not new law, I think it should also be emphasized that this case is nonprecedential.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com