tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post6180448541099508208..comments2024-03-05T06:00:22.338-05:00Comments on All Things Pros: BPAI gives written description rejection when "specification and claims merely recite a description of a problem while claiming all solutions to it"Karen G. Hazzahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14864564225463528630noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post-59097566382046102762011-01-18T17:27:52.105-05:002011-01-18T17:27:52.105-05:00Note that upon closer inspection the board gave th...Note that upon closer inspection the board gave them a 112 2nd as well. I had just been pondering why such would be missing prior to having read the decision. <br /><br />"Learn to claim or gtfo" is what they say in the technically competent areas of the office.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post-15524373101260338432011-01-18T15:17:01.811-05:002011-01-18T15:17:01.811-05:00"But if that's the case, then isn't s..."But if that's the case, then isn't satisfaction of the three manufacturing requirements simply an inherent result of the claimed structure? "<br /><br />Demonstrably so. The examiner's rejection was probably fine as well. If he left out some factual findings then he should go ahead and make them of record on remand. <br /><br />Note the similarity of this case to B claim cases. Note how the booard might just see fit to treat such a claim when a technically competent board reviews the case.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com