tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post8357783476227001553..comments2024-03-05T06:00:22.338-05:00Comments on All Things Pros: Federal Circuit rules on indefiniteness standard and on "adapted to"Karen G. Hazzahhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14864564225463528630noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post-51275515647417648292014-06-11T14:45:02.568-04:002014-06-11T14:45:02.568-04:00"The court relied on the specification's ..."The court relied on the specification's disclosure of embodiments that were specifically designed for rowing. "<br /><br />I see the fed. circ. is now trying to make a new "super intended use" limitation called the "specifically designed for x intended use limitation" since they're losing on the ol software front and badly need such a type of limitation to help support their house of cards. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6733236595417664807.post-52941786951231754042014-05-26T22:25:58.066-04:002014-05-26T22:25:58.066-04:00Examiners are allowed to apply a different standar...Examiners are allowed to apply a different standard of claim interpretation than the Courts.<br />Examiners are allowed to apply a different standard of indefiniteness than the Courts.<br />Examiners already unofficially apply a different standard of obviousness than the Courts so how much longer will it be before they are officially allowed to do so?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com